Pages

Saturday, October 5, 2019

The Perfect Symbol for the Current Pornocracy


The recent tree-planting ceremony in the Vatican, a preview kick-off for the Amazonian Synod, featured a sort of tribal picnic blanket on which were placed various native statues and objects.



The above scene was described by Getty Images, thus:
ROME, ITALY - OCTOBER 04: Pope Francis and Cardinal Cardinal Cláudio Hummes, Archbishop Emeritus of São Paulo, President of the Pan-Amazonian Ecclesial Network (REPAM), stand in front of a statue representing Pachamama (Mother Earth) as they celebrate the Feast of St. Francis of Assisi at the Vatican Gardens on October 04, 2019 in Rome, Italy. During a highly symbolic tree-planting ceremony in the Vatican Gardens on Friday, Pope Francis places the upcoming Synod for the Amazon under the protection of Saint Francis of Assisi. (Photo by Giulio Origlia/Getty Images)
This obviously seems embarrassingly pagan, so apologists for the Vatican soon spread the word that the two most prominent statues ("Pachamama" and a similar one) actually represented the Visitation of Mary and Elizabeth.

How DARE anyone suggest this was a pagan ceremony?*




Apparently, the Catholic shamans moved the objects around like kids would on a play mat.

What were the other objects? To be honest, I don't really want to know, especially that long thing with the purple and orange striped ends. But it turns out that the apologists had cropped a larger image*. Here's a different version, panning right:



Let's pan in more on the right:



Yes, it appears to be a naked man with an erect Coco.

Fertility idol? Not at all, it's simply a statue of one of the prelate inhabitants of Sanctae Marthae taking in a bit of sun.

One Twitter friend made a funny comment:


Arising?

Okay, but here's some cold water for you:


This is reassuring. And I'm happy I didn't have to become hysterical. The lefties won't get any ammo from me, today.

I'm NOT crazy.

But I'm still not sure I understand what's going on. Is it his arm? Which arm? Does he have half an arm on one side and no arm on the other?


Is that half an arm or are you just glad to see me?

Yes, people are now debating this on Twitter, complete with different pictures at different angles with pointers and little circles and all the rest. What is it, really?

I don't care.

The original photo, however we characterize the native protrusion in question, is still the perfect symbol for the current pornocracy. The term was originally coined by a Protestant historian to describe the corrupt papacies of the 10th century. It originally meant rule by prostitutes.

But I think it could also mean rule by the corrupt and sexually perverted. When they're not scheming to cover up scandals or ambiguify to death Church teachings, they're engaging in "drug-fueled orgies" - one of them, as we all know, broken up by the police just a few hundred yards from that picnic blanket.

But as we also all know, none of the sexually in question has anything to do with fertility.



*H/t Steve Skojec and Nick Donnelly.

6 comments:

  1. If that's an arm extended forward, it raises a question: Whose elbow is below the waist?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Not buying it. I could care less what the Lefties think. We need to all care less what the Lefties think. In context, we have two carved naked women, obviously pregnant with breasts exposed and complete (nips), and nearby, a little carved man...these are fertility symbols, pagan idols, and there sits our pope, presiding over a Santeria ritual and giving his blessing, stingy as it always is. Of course he demurs to make comment, because after all, he "didn't know" what was going to be happening. He never does according to them. He's the dodderingest old man to ever inhabit the office, he never knows WHAT the hell is going on, so they say. That's for fools. Of course he's directing the entire thing start to finish. It's a Pagan Fest, he's demon-infested, and we all need to find a Traditional Latin Mass and stop attending Novus Ordo and ever giving money to this totally apostate church.

    ReplyDelete
  3. "The Perfect Symbol for the Current Pornocracy"

    You got that right! Duplicates should sell well.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Finally, life imitates Monty Python: "The BBC would like to announce that the next scene is not considered suitable for family viewing. It contains scenes of violence, involving people's heads and arms getting chopped off, their ears nailed to trees, and their toenails pulled out in slow motion. There are also scenes of naked women with floppy breasts, and also at one point you can see a pair of buttocks and there's another bit where I'll swear you can see everything, but my friend says it's just the way he's holding the spear."

    ReplyDelete
  5. Now we know:
    The large pregnant female = Amazon idol Yacy, the Moon goddess
    The smaller pregnant female = Amazon idol Ruda, goddess of love
    The enthusiastic male figure with phallus = Guaracy, god of the Sun
    Yacy is self-generating, doesn't need a male
    Ruda can copulate with Guaracy
    This is sheer paganism. Our pope presided over, and blessed, a pagan ritual where false gods were worshipped and called upon.
    He is no doubt infested with demons himself.
    Thanks to St. Thomas Aquinas on Twitter (I believe) who educated all on who these were.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The Antichrist is Born

    The Basilica of Nursia lay in ruins on Oct. 30 *, 2016 on the feast of Our Lord Jesus Christ the King, as established by Pope Pius XI. The only thing left of the noble edifice was the facade, that the guts of the Church, the holy Catholic faith, had already been ripped out by the infernal enemy.
    "Rome will lose faith" ... - The Blessed Virgin prophesied this in La Salette in 1846, but then, already at the time of Bl. Pius IX, the church's freemasonry feverishly worked to ridicule Her messages and make a madwoman with Melanie Calvat.They have done their job: the Saletinian Fathers claim to this day that this is a false prophecy, although the course of events in the Vatican shows their authenticity.
    ... "and become the seat of the Antichrist". It happened: the false prophet Jorge the Apostate, participating, on October 4th, in a pagan ritual, tenderly embraced a figurine of a pregnant „false Hebrew nun”, who on the lawn in the Vatican Gardens gave birth to an incarnate Satan: this wooden boy without diapers on the blanket. We will soon find out his identity: he is an elderly man, because his grandmother was born on September 29th,1896(!). It happened on feast of Saint Francis of Assisi, to whom the Lord Jesus entrusted with an unimaginably difficult task: "Rebuild my Church." And what was to be done, the Poverello? (In this context his nickname is the most adequate.) At Christmas AD1223 he erected a rocky manger in Greccio (Lazio). For whom? After all, Jesus Christ the Savior was born 1223 years earlier. So who is this hard cradle for? For the another Comforter, the Paraclete, the Anointed of God who will fight and defeat Antichrist with the breath of his mouth. Where did he come from? Our Mother the Holy Church will give birth to him in the midst of persecution that has never happened before and will not be there later.
    October 7th, the feast of Our Lady of the Rosary

    * Vigil to Saint Quentin, Martyr - The Eldest Daughter of the Church, i.e. France, still matters and together with the 'Fifth' ('Quintus') will again light up the darkness of the world.

    ReplyDelete