 |
| No Reaganite I know would ever speak at the Hinckley Institute |
Okay, I lied about part of what I claimed in the post title. The Loser can sue me if he wants.
But here's what The Loser actually just wrote on his Facebook page:
Vulgarity. Oh, that's just so awful. It makes me want to drink a glass of milk and launch a mob attack against a rival cult organization.
In the interests of complete Facebook disclosure, I will reproduce the first sixteen comments on The Loser's Facebook post (but I could have gone on). Somehow, I think things may have backfired. I didn't know there were that many thumbs in the world.
"I will vote for Senator Cruz and I encourage other to do so as well so that we can have an open convention and nominate a Republican (read Mitt Romney)."
ReplyDeleteIn other words, Mitt is using Cruz to keep a place open for himself.
Cruz and Trump need to make a deal to make sure they aren't screwed by the loser Republican establishment and it's casting director Presidential pick, loser Mitt Romney.
Well, this one just got me kicked out of the largest conservatives group on Google+. Am I the only one who still has a sense of humor?
ReplyDeleteI am not a Trumpster, but this diatribe by Romney is not only over the top, but certainly not his M.O. When he campaigned against Obama, he reminded me of 'Mr. Roger's Neighborhood'. Neither he nor McCain would hold Obama's feet to the fire. I remember both of them saying that they wanted to keep the campaign 'above board' and 'civil', but they wouldn't call him out on much of anything. Meanwhile Obama was telling his supporters to go out and 'get in people's faces', and 'if they bring a knife, we'll bring a gun'. NOW, he's using all kinds of incendiary language against someone who is running as a Republican? Too unbelievable!!! You may be right about this Michael, perhaps he is vying for a possible run in a contested convention, but it is absolutely backfiring, and if the Republicans try to pull some funny stuff, they are throwing the election to Hillary. I read somewhere that a good number of the 'elites' would actually rather have it that way. Wonder if it's dawned on anyone that the Republican Party would be in shambles for many years to come??
ReplyDeleteWonder if it's dawned on anyone that the Republican Party would be in shambles for many years to come??
ReplyDeleteNewsflash: it's been in shambles since Dick Nixon, with only a short respite in the 1980's--and even then, it was having serious problems.
See, the Pubbies bought into 'secular humanism' which is irreconcilable with any cogent form of Conservatism. That's why they cannot any longer maintain unity.
To cut to the chase, either the Party recognizes Original Sin and its consequences in the political sphere, or it will go away.