Showing posts with label jfk. Show all posts
Showing posts with label jfk. Show all posts

Friday, March 3, 2017

A Note on Great Political Speeches

"We choose to go to the moon..."

Two days ago, I called Trump's Address to Congress, "tremendous" and "the speech of the century."

A liberal friend of a friend bombed onto my Facebook wall and said:
I can read from a teleprompter too, and make vague statements without getting into any details. Does that make me tremendous as well?
I actually thought that was a concession. And it's been echoed by other anti-Trumpers on Twitter. Instead of calling the Address "dark" or "fascist" or whatever, as they did for the Inaugural, they're essentially saying: okay, anyone can make a speech, but does he really mean it, and will he actually keep his promises?

Translation: it was a good speech.

Obviously, one's political predilections to some extent shade one's opinions on the matter. Historians say that Hitler was a "mesmerizing" orator, but few would call any of his speeches "great." That's because we don't like him and what he represented.

But still, outliers aside, when one evaluates a speech, one is generally evaluating . . . the speech. Was it interesting, entertaining, inspiring, profound and so on.

And no, not anyone can read a good speech. Delivery is important. And of course, while modern American politicians do not singlehandedly write their own speeches from scratch, their direction, choices, distinctive turns of phrase, changes (or decisions on what not to change) matter.

Reagan was told not to say, "tear down this wall." He didn't take that advice.

And history was made.

I'm pretty equal opportunity. I liked Trump's speech. I liked Reagan's speeches. But I thought those of the Bushes were generally pretty bad.

I thought Clinton and Obama were vastly overrated as speakers. Does anyone remember anything Obama actually said in the hundreds of speeches that he made? Does anyone remember a Clinton turn of phrase, other than, "I did not have sex with that woman . . . Ms. Lewinsky"? Clinton was almost booed off the stage during his excruciatingly tedious first national speech.

John F. Kennedy was a mediocre president and a distinctively problematic moral example. But I thought some of his speeches were amazing. I could listen to his "moon shot" speech for hours.

Roosevelt was one of the worst things to ever happen to this country. But he was often a very inspiring orator.

What makes a great speaker? In terms of delivery, I would say that "smoothness" can be a disadvantage. Clinton and Obama were smooth but boring.

A good salesman doesn't sound like a salesman.

Kennedy had a Boston accent. Churchill - one of the greatest orators of all time - had a speech impediment. Listen to his classic speeches on YouTube. He often sounds like that cartoon character, Sylvester the Cat.

Trump also is distinctive. He's a brash New Yorker who uses girly phrases like, "it will be a beautiful thing." You either find it endearing or it fills you with rage. But it doesn't put you to sleep.

But I think ideological commitment also counts. I honestly do not think that the Bushes or Clinton or even Obama felt anything very deeply in their core, so to speak. That's not a criticism per se, just an observation. We can't all burn with ideological zeal, at least publicly. And it's sometimes (depending on the historical context) better to have a leader who doesn't do that.

Okay, maybe Obama had ideological zeal for himself.

And I'm using "ideology" in the wide sense. Reagan was a libertarian conservative. Churchill was a believer in Western civilization. Roosevelt, Kennedy and, yes, Trump, each in their own ways, were and are dedicated proponents of what we might call, "Americanism."

Sure, they all had and have strong egos. That's a given. But they also believed, or at least appeared to believe in some principle or thing outside of themselves.

Who are the great Catholic orators (no, Kennedy doesn't really count)? Were Pope Pius X or Blessed Karl good speakers? I have no idea. YouTube doesn't go back that far.

But John Paul II had it. Say what you like about his sometime Modernism, but he could move crowds. When he first visited Poland as pope, people followed him home and went to sleep under his balcony. He had to come out and tell them to go away.

Friday, July 22, 2016

"We choose to go to the moon, not because it is easy, but because it is hard."


Forty-seven years ago today,* a man first walked on the moon.

After six moon landings over a span of three-years, manned space travel was abandoned for a half a century. That fact is emblematic of our inwardly focused "modern" times.

And even though it looks like we're close to going back, it is arguably not the same.

Back in the day, space was for the people, not for spoiled internet tycoons.

The beautiful and inspiring documentary For All Mankind, chronicles the six successful Apollo moon landings, among other things employing stunning footage of men walking, running, jumping, falling and even careening at speed (in a moon buggy) across its surface. Many of these scenes have been all but forgotten.


Apollo 17 astronaut Jack Schmidt and the lunar rover on the edge of Shorty Crater

The film begins with a speech by John F. Kennedy, made at Rice University in 1962, outlining the plan to "land men on the moon and return them safely back to Earth" by the end of the decade.

To any space nut, patriot or mere aficionado of human achievement and the human spirit, it has to be one of the most inspiring speeches ever made.

Kennedy is a Boston Brahmin - "because it is hahd" - crossed with David Mamet - "and do the other things."

Here's the excerpt, with the actual text slightly rearranged (and one phrase altered), as it appears in the film:   
We choose to go to the moon. We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard. 
We set sail on this new sea because there is new knowledge to be gained, and new rights to be won, and they must be won and used for all mankind. 
We shall send to the moon, 240,000 miles away from the control station in Houston, a giant rocket more than 300 feet tall, the length of this football field, made of new metal alloys, some of which have not yet been invented, capable of standing heat and stresses several times more than have ever been experienced, fitted together with a precision better than the finest watch, carrying all the equipment needed for propulsion, guidance, control, communications, food and survival, on an untried mission, to an unknown celestial body... 
And, therefore, as we set sail we ask God's blessing on the most hazardous and dangerous and greatest adventure on which man has ever embarked.
Watch the speech - the first two minutes of Part I of the film - below. Then, if you have time and you haven't done so already, view the entire movie. (The other parts are available on YouTube. You can also watch it on Hulu Streaming, among other places.)

  

*The Lunar Module touched down on July 20th at 20:18 UTC. Neil Armstrong planted his foot on the surface on July 21st at 2:56 UTC. This post was delayed one day due to American politics.