Thursday, August 4, 2016
Hey, Google, Thanks for Becoming an Accessory to Rape
Edit, 8/5/16: For some reason, the invitation to "stand with refugees" appeared yesterday on UK Google but not US Google (I didn't check any other countries and the message is now gone). Interestingly, the hashtag brings one to a YouTube page that features a pro-refugee video followed by a list of other videos, some of which are anti-. For example, one of the videos is a documentary about the mass sexual assaults on New Year's Eve in Cologne.
Hey, Google, thanks for becoming an accessory to rape.
I'm referring to the statement in small letters at the bottom of the Google search window, above.
What's wrong with it (some might ask)? Google is merely saying that, you know, everyone, whatever your country, whatever your sport, should "stand with refugees." Who could be against that? It's completely uncontroversial.
No.
Europe is currently under sustained assault by barbarians - Muslim barbarians, to be precise. And rape, including mass rape is one of the consequences of this assault.
Remember Cologne. Remember Sweden - which in the space of a generation has gone from one of the safest countries in Europe to being the rape capital of the world.
Sure they're "refugees," on one definition at least. But using that term and leaving it at that, advocating that we all "stand with refugees," is in a very real way to be a collaborator - partly through dishonesty - with the assault.
Real people - innocent people - are suffering. And looking past "mere" rape, many innocent people are dying. Many many more will die.
Google is now an accessory to it.
The slogan - "don't be evil" - is still a part of the official Google Code of Conduct.
Well, they're violating it.
Google stands with refugees.
Who will stand with her?
Mother of Russell Square Stabber "Always Wore a Full Black Burka"
![]() |
| Zakaria Bulhan, four years ago (Daily Mail) |
Information is starting to come out about the Russell Square stabber - the 19-year-old man whom police coyly dubbed, "a Norwegian of Somali origin."
Predictably, the Norwegian link turned out to be tangential. Zakaria Bulhan was born in Somalia and lived only a short time in Norway (presumably his family had been granted some form of asylum or residency there) before his family moved to Great Britain.
From the Daily Mail:
The Somali-born man accused of stabbing an American citizen to death and injuring five others in the Russell Square attack was a 'quiet, shy pupil who was bullied at his London secondary school', MailOnline can reveal.
Zakaria Bulhan, 19, moved to the UK from Norway in 2002, and was said to be suffering possible 'mental health issues' when he allegedly began silently stabbing his unsuspecting victims in a busy London street last night.
His former friends from Graveney School in Tooting, south London, have now revealed how Chelsea football fan Bulhan was a quiet boy who was bullied in the early stages of secondary school.
One friend said: ‘He was quite quiet, but had friends. He was a little bullied but nothing too extreme.’
...
Tonight, Bulhan's former friends claimed he had allegedly threatened to stab his friends two years ago after he started 'acting strangely'.
She said: 'They had been friends for five years roughly, but when everyone left Graveney they distanced themselves because he was acting odd – [making] weird threats.
'He said to another mutual friend he wanted to stab his friends. But this apparently wasn't true according to Zak. Apparently it was a joke.'
The classmate said he was not religious, adding: 'He was quite quiet, but had friends. He was a little bullied but nothing too extreme.'
She said old schoolfriends of Bulhan had seen the news and were shocked to see his name linked to the incident.
Earlier today, police raided the south London council flat where he lived with his family. Neighbours of alleged knifeman said his mother was 'really nice' but knew little about her two sons.
The family live on the middle floor of a three-storey block of flats next to St George's Hospital in Tooting.
As two uniformed police officers stood guard outside the flat today, the neighbour described how police have been coming in and out all day.
The unnamed woman said: 'There was lots of policemen there this morning.The mother is always here. She's really kind and friendly and always opened the door and got parcels for us.
'They're a Muslim family, the mother always wore a full black burka.
'I asked the police what is happening but they can't say at the moment. I heard lots of banging and noises and saw the police carrying out a black bag'.
The neighbour who lives above Bulhan's flat heard a raid and saw 'around 30 officers on the stairs.'
A downstairs neighbour confirmed that a mother and two young men live in the flat. He said: 'I've only really spoken to them to say 'hi'. The mother is very pleasant. She always asks after me and my mother.
'I've never had a conversation with either of the two boys. Apparently they are Somalian but they all speak with an English accent. The mother is really quiet. She always has her hijab on but she's a very pleasant woman and speaks proper English'.
Read the rest here.
Aren't all Muslims Mentally Ill?
![]() |
| Channel 4 presenter Fatima Manji - Does she believe that the Koran is the direct revelation of God? If so, what does that say about her? |
By "Muslim" here, I mean someone who has freely made an informed choice to accept the teachings of Islam - perhaps someone like Fatima Manji, above. Because Islam is a totalitarian ideology that thrives on ignorance, intimidation and fear, that condition probably applies only to a minority of Muslims. The rest are more or less victims.
Many Muslims are mentally ill, or at least so we are told. Often we are told this after the Muslim in question has just shot, stabbed or slashed some random group of people, sometimes while shouting "Allahu Akbar!"
Skeptics complain that the "mental illness" attribution is often merely a strategy to deflect attention from the real problems - a preoccupation with death and violence, among other things - with the Muslim religion. I agree, of course, but here I would like to look at things from another angle. Let's take the mental illness claim seriously.
Consider:
You read, perhaps in translation, a 1400-year-old book, originally written in classical Arabic, that claims to be God's ultimate and eternal revelation. It was supposedly dictated by God (through the mediation of an angel) but contains all sorts of odd mistakes, arrogant boasts and prominent "abrogations" and corrections, many of which are to the obvious benefit of the man whom God supposedly dictated the book to.
That man was a caravan raider.
One of the verses in God's ultimate and eternal revelation informs the caravan raider's wives that they should stop sniping and snipping at their husband for having sex with slave girls. He can have sex with whomever he wants. God later says that if his wives have a problem with that, it would be best if their husband divorced them.
In a number of places in the book it is explained that if you kill "unbelievers" - people who reject the claim that the book was dictated by God - and you die in the process, you will be instantly transported to heaven where, if you are a man, you will be able to have sex with 72 virgins forever, interspersed with sherbet breaks. The book is unclear about what you get if you're a woman, but elsewhere the caravan raider is on record as saying that there aren't many women in heaven anyway.
You affirm that this book is God's ultimate and eternal revelation, and thus confidently proclaim yourself to be a Muslim.
You wear your hijab with pride.
Aren't all Muslims mentally ill?
Wednesday, August 3, 2016
In France, We Kill Priests and Raze Churches
Early this morning I saw some tweets and articles about riot police bursting into a Parisian church during Mass and forcibly removing the celebrants. (This was to clear the church in order to make way for a long-planned demolition.) There was a picture of an altar boy being hustled out and a priest stretched out on the ground.
To me, the priest looked almost like he was being confirmed (during the confirmation ceremony, there's a point at which all new priests lie face down) except this time there was an armored cop clutching one of his arms.
The church was called Sainte Rita and the #SainteRita hashtag was already trending on Twitter although unfortunately (for me) virtually all of the Tweets and links were in French.
I wanted to write about it, in part because at the time, given the paucity of English information on it, the story seemed obscure. There were also many (to me) confusing elements to it. After dashing off a few messages to Catholic friends asking if they knew anything about what had happened, I went back to sleep.
Four hours later I saw that the story had exploded. Videos and pictures of the raid were all over the French media and they had clearly already acquired a symbolic resonance, coming so soon after the murder of Fr. Jacques Hamel in Saint-Étienne. Marion Le Pen tweeted the photographs of the altar boy and the priest being manhandled, adding the simple caption, "France, 2016."
Breitbart London had picked it up and The Washington Post covered it. To my mind the most comprehensive piece was written by Matthew Karmel/Radical Catholic on OnePeterFive.
Among other things, Karmel explicated the somewhat confusing situation of which Catholic group had been occupying the church (and thus who had been ejected). The church had previously been operated by the Gallican Catholic Church - a quirky sect that had been in schism with Rome for over a century. Originally thought of as "liberal" (they had rejected Vatican I), they were now thought of as traditionalist (they also rejected Vatican II). To make things even more interesting, the Gallicans (or at least this particular church) became famous for having an annual blessing of animals and allowing pets to attend Mass (which was celebrated in Latin). As a result, "the animal church" had gained a following among both traditionalist Catholics as well as Catholic and non-Catholic animal lovers.
However, alone among English commentators, Karmel pointed out that the Gallicans had recently yielded the church to another group - the Institute of the Good Shepherd, a traditionalist order that was in full communion with Rome. The priests, altar boys and (presumably) parishioners who were hustled and dragged out by police were not members of a schismatic sect but "normal" Catholics, albeit of the particularly dedicated Latin Mass variety.
Curiously, however, in the midst of the chaos one lay person could be seen carrying an obviously agitated dog. I'm still not clear as to whether this was some sort of accident - the woman and dog had just entered from another area - or whether the Institute had, perhaps counter to what one might expect, continued the "animals allowed" policy of the Gallicans.
Carmel also vividly described the events:
But in this alleged State of Emergency, where everyone acknowledges a shortage of police and soldiers to protect citizens from Islamic terrorism, it was interesting to see that the French state had seen fit to spare a squad of police for a different sort of job - invading a church during Mass.
And this, precisely one week after another Mass had been invaded, ending with an 86-year-old priest having his throat slit at the altar.
On the sheet metal fence that had been erected outside the Church, someone had sprayed in large letters:
Here are some pictures and videos of yesterday's events:
To me, the priest looked almost like he was being confirmed (during the confirmation ceremony, there's a point at which all new priests lie face down) except this time there was an armored cop clutching one of his arms.
The church was called Sainte Rita and the #SainteRita hashtag was already trending on Twitter although unfortunately (for me) virtually all of the Tweets and links were in French.
I wanted to write about it, in part because at the time, given the paucity of English information on it, the story seemed obscure. There were also many (to me) confusing elements to it. After dashing off a few messages to Catholic friends asking if they knew anything about what had happened, I went back to sleep.
Four hours later I saw that the story had exploded. Videos and pictures of the raid were all over the French media and they had clearly already acquired a symbolic resonance, coming so soon after the murder of Fr. Jacques Hamel in Saint-Étienne. Marion Le Pen tweeted the photographs of the altar boy and the priest being manhandled, adding the simple caption, "France, 2016."
Breitbart London had picked it up and The Washington Post covered it. To my mind the most comprehensive piece was written by Matthew Karmel/Radical Catholic on OnePeterFive.
Among other things, Karmel explicated the somewhat confusing situation of which Catholic group had been occupying the church (and thus who had been ejected). The church had previously been operated by the Gallican Catholic Church - a quirky sect that had been in schism with Rome for over a century. Originally thought of as "liberal" (they had rejected Vatican I), they were now thought of as traditionalist (they also rejected Vatican II). To make things even more interesting, the Gallicans (or at least this particular church) became famous for having an annual blessing of animals and allowing pets to attend Mass (which was celebrated in Latin). As a result, "the animal church" had gained a following among both traditionalist Catholics as well as Catholic and non-Catholic animal lovers.
However, alone among English commentators, Karmel pointed out that the Gallicans had recently yielded the church to another group - the Institute of the Good Shepherd, a traditionalist order that was in full communion with Rome. The priests, altar boys and (presumably) parishioners who were hustled and dragged out by police were not members of a schismatic sect but "normal" Catholics, albeit of the particularly dedicated Latin Mass variety.
Curiously, however, in the midst of the chaos one lay person could be seen carrying an obviously agitated dog. I'm still not clear as to whether this was some sort of accident - the woman and dog had just entered from another area - or whether the Institute had, perhaps counter to what one might expect, continued the "animals allowed" policy of the Gallicans.
Carmel also vividly described the events:
It was a scene with which all who attend the traditional Latin Mass are perfectly familiar – except, perhaps, for the fact that most of the parishioners were standing. They were standing because the pews had been removed in order to form a barricade at the entrance to the church. A group of police in riot gear and armed with truncheons and tear gas was outside preparing to storm the building. St. Rita has been slated for demolition since October 2015.
As the police began ripping the pews away from the entrance, the faithful, arms locked, broke out in song. The priest continued reciting the ancient prayers. The altar boy remained at his side. A second priest led a small group kneeling beside the sanctuary in the recitation of the Rosary. Some of the faithful prepared handkerchiefs for covering their noses in the case that the police decided to put their canisters of tear gas to use.
As the police stormed the church, the faithful quickly retreated to the sanctuary, encircling the steps to the altar, using their bodies to protect the priest and the altar boy, who were still celebrating Holy Mass. One by one, they were forcefully torn away. The priest who had been praying the Rosary was thrown to the floor and dragged from the sanctuary and out of the church. Fr. Guillaume de Tanoüarn, still engrossed in the celebration of the Divine Liturgy, was pulled from the altar by his vestments and forced outside.No one disputes that the planned demolition was legal, at least in some sense of the term. The current owners of the property - a third entity separate from both the Gallican Church and the Institute had decided to raze the church and convert it into a car park.
But in this alleged State of Emergency, where everyone acknowledges a shortage of police and soldiers to protect citizens from Islamic terrorism, it was interesting to see that the French state had seen fit to spare a squad of police for a different sort of job - invading a church during Mass.
And this, precisely one week after another Mass had been invaded, ending with an 86-year-old priest having his throat slit at the altar.
On the sheet metal fence that had been erected outside the Church, someone had sprayed in large letters:
In France, we kill priests and raze churches.And then next to it, the Greek words of the traditional liturgy, "Kyrie Eleison!"
Lord have mercy on us!
----------------------
Here are some pictures and videos of yesterday's events:
![]() |
| Sainte Rita |
![]() |
| "We're from the government and we're here to help you" |
![]() |
| Parishioners on the other side of the fence (notice that it had been used as a stand for plants) |
![]() |
| Pews as barricades |
![]() |
| Not all French protesters wear black |
![]() |
| They weren't preparing for incense |
![]() |
| Catholic terrorist |
![]() |
| "You're coming with us, Father." |
![]() |
| Mass is over |
![]() |
| A job well done: Police lounging under graffiti reading, "In France, we kill priests and raze churches." |
Tuesday, August 2, 2016
Pope Video 8: Finally a Black Man Who Isn't Holding a Spear
![]() |
| I'm glad they finally let him on the team. |
The new Pope Video is out and it begins with a black man kicking a soccer ball at the camera.
I have written previously about the curious absence of black people in the first seven Pope Videos, made all the more jarring by the rainbow of other races and by the nature of the few exceptions - two African kids on a rusty bed in what looks like a shack and a child's drawing of a "typical" African family with Dad wearing a grass skirt and carrying a spear.
It's an Argentine thing, I think.
| From Pope Video 4 |
In the new video, there's a black male soccer player, a white female tennis player, an asian male ping pong player (stereotype alert), a scary white male rugby player (obviously meant to placate Vikings) and a female Indian volleyball player. The mercifully short narration by the Pope emphasizes the value of sport in fomenting a culture of encounter and helping the cause of world peace:
Sports make it possible to build a culture of encounter among everyone for a world of peace. I dream of sports as the practice of human dignity, turned into a vehicle of fraternity. Do we exercise together this prayer intention? That sports may be an opportunity for friendly encounters between people and may contribute to peace in the world.For Pope skeptics such as myself there are of course the usual annoyances - the failure to mention any Christian or Catholic things - Christ, God the Church, etc. - the use of the Pope's favorite buzzwords - culture of encounter - which for skeptics like me may contain quasi-sinister connotations and so on.
There's also the unbelievably narcissistic implied claim that after, say, 120 years of modern international Olympic competition, finally someone (Pope Francis) has come along who really understands that sports may help people from different countries come together in mutual brotherhood, and that finally someone (Pope Francis) has enunciated a plan to further effectuate that.
If you think I'm being unfair about this, consider his words. If sports as a "vehicle of fraternity" had been already happening, why would the Pope say he only has a "dream" of it?
The weirdest thing about the video is the reoccurring image of a wall being breached - not being broken down exactly, but literally being penetrated in rapid succession by a soccer ball, tennis ball, rugby ball (the ping pong ball was too small, I guess) and volleyball.
When I saw the soccer ball hit the wall for the first time to a kind of downer note in the music - brong! - I actually thought the video was turning into "if at first you don't succeed, try try again" message - the poor guy meant to kick the ball into the net but hit some wall on the sidelines instead, and he even chipped off a bit of the plaster on it. How embarrassing.
Of course it's a metaphor for breaking down walls - the same ones presumably that Donald Trump, international finance capital, weapons manufacturers, Cardinal Burke and all the other neo-pelagians are busy erecting, patching up, extending, reinforcing, etc.
But the balls hit the wall with a force that Serena Williams could only dream about. They look like they've been shot out of howitzers - as all the while the Pope mentions and re-mentions the word "peace." I suppose the effect could have been intentional. Tennis balls as rocket grenades.
Irony.
Monday, August 1, 2016
Amazing Skydiving First: Luke Aikens Jumps From 25,000 Feet WITHOUT Parachute or Wingsuit, Lands in Net (FULL VIDEO)
![]() |
| The net at only 2,000 feet. At this point, it doesn't look like he's over it. |
As bad as the world is, people are still doing cool things.
If you're not familiar with what happened Saturday night, let me repeat:
A man jumped out of a plane from five miles up and landed in a specially designed net.
Nothing like that has ever been done or attempted before.
This was not a trick. Veteran skydiver Luke Aikens was wearing only a standard (non-winged) jumpsuit and a helmet. That's it.
From the plane, the 100 x 100 ft. double net didn't look like a postage stamp - it looked like a pin point.
It took two minutes for him to hit it.
Unbelievably, he landed precisely in the center, flipping onto his back at the last second to avoid having his spine curved into breaking by the wrap-around give of the net.
Aikens was assisted by three comrades who, wearing parachutes themselves, peeled off at 5,000 feet. Read more about his jump here.
Here is the video. Pay attention to the "thermometer" recording his progress and how many seconds he has left. If your heart is not in your mouth, then you are not a human being (or you are braver than I).
Obviously, skydivers have done cool things before. The first wingsuit landing without a parachute was made in 2012. It ended not in a net, but in a gigantic pile of cardboard boxes.
And of course there have been incidents where skydivers have survived their parachutes only partially opening or have grabbed onto other parachutists (because their own parachute wouldn't open), etc.
Interestingly, there are three recorded cases of people surviving mile-high plus free falls. All of them were pilots during WWII - a Brit, a Russian and an American. Their "nets" were, respectively, trees, a snow covered ravine and the glass roof of the St. Nazaire railway station.
Perhaps the most famous case was that of a Yugoslavian stewardess who survived a fall of 33,000 feet when her airplane blew up (probably from a terrorist bomb) mid-flight. While her case was indeed miraculous, Vesna Vulovic, 22, went down in the detached tail section, and thus might have been somewhat slowed and/or cushioned by it.
Without a parachute or wingsuit, you reach terminal velocity after about 1,000 feet or so - that's 120 mph if you're face-down with your arms out and slightly faster if you're tumbling randomly. If you wish to go into a dive you can approach 180 mph.
But to return to Mr. Aikens, who has made over 18,000 lifetime jumps and comes from a family of aviators, to me the most incredible thing was how he managed to hit that net. Throughout the jump, the "Luke Cam" records his view of the net below. It gets "larger" as he approaches, but even just a few seconds away, it seemed to me no larger than, say a kid's trampoline as viewed from the roof of my ten-story condo building. See the post title picture, above.
For the fun of it, below, I've also included a video of the record-breaking wing-suit dive into cardboard boxes stunt and a clip each from two of my favorite cheesy skydiving movies. (Yes, cheesy skydiving movies are a genre.)
Enjoy.
Gary Connery, 23 May, 2012, Oxfordshire:
Terminal Velocity (1994), Charlie Sheen and Nastassja Kinski:
Drop Zone (1994), Wesley Snipes, Yancy Butler:
The Fruit Salad Pontificate
![]() |
| Pope Francis and Imam Ahmed el-Tayeb |
In the midst of a wave of horrific Islamic terrorist assaults featuring axe attacks, machete attacks, knife attacks, shootings and bombings at airports and subway stations, suicide vest bombings, car bombings, a mass killing at a nightclub, a mass killing at a concert hall where people were tortured and bodies were mutilated on a floor slick with blood, raids on schools, museums, hotels and restaurants where non-Muslim were often separated out and hacked to death, mammoth car bombs that murdered hundreds, automatic weapons fired into crowds, the use of a nineteen-ton cargo truck to mow down holiday revelers including many children and infants and most recently, the invasion of a church during Mass, where the priest had his throat slit at the altar while a parishioner was forced to film it, the leader of the Catholic Church said this:
If I speak of Islamic violence, I must speak of Catholic violence. And no, not all Muslims are violent, not all Catholics are violent. It is like a fruit salad; there’s everything.When the history of this time is written, assuming of course that civilization prevails, I believe the Pope's bizarrely off-key "fruit salad" metaphor may come to symbolize the intellectual decadence of the post-Christian West (or at least it's as good a candidate as any). And if you think about it, as disturbing as it may be for Catholics, it's almost appropriate from the point of view of history that the words were uttered by a decadent post-Christian Pope.
For that's what Bergoglio clearly is, isn't he? He is decadent in the sense that as war builds against the civilization that the Church largely built, he - the leader of that Church - stands above it and removed from it, issuing effete comments - "fruit salad" - while his people are stabbed, hacked, beheaded, shot, crushed or blown to bits.
He is post-Christian in the sense that he wants to be known not as the champion of Christ and Christians but as a leader of religions or of the forces of good or of humanity or whatever other general category he wants to hype in a homily, interview or slickly produced video. Here he emphasizes that there is nothing about Christians or Catholics that makes them particularly special:
I don’t like to speak of Islamic violence, because every day, when I browse the newspapers, I see violence, here in Italy - this one who has murdered his girlfriend, another who has murdered the mother-in-law - and these are baptized Catholics! There are violent Catholics!
Later in his remarks, he spoke of his relationship with a Muslim Imam, saying, "I know how they think." Many are aware that that same Muslim Imam thinks that his religion mandates the execution of those who convert to Christianity. I used to believe the Pope was unaware of this. Now I'm not so sure. In the three plus years of his pontificate, I do not believe the Pope has ever positively spoken of conversion - in the sense of officially converting to Christianity from another religion. For Bergoglio, Christianity is almost an ethnic category, valuable and useful in its way certainly - to move its members towards the good - but no better than the other categories, Islam among them, that people may have been born into.
Someone wishing to convert to Christianity - well that has the whiff of fundamentalism about it, which from the post-Christian point of view, is one of the only true evils. Execution is obviously extreme. But islam is a different religion - a fruit salad like all the others. Who are we to judge? Just yesterday, a baptized Catholic murdered his girlfriend.
Juan Mario Bergoglio wants ever so much to be remembered as the Pope of Mercy. I absolutely guarantee that in the end he will not be, though we may all be dead before this can be conclusively verified by history. The following is a more likely label:
The Fruit Salad Pontificate.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

















