Saturday, June 18, 2016

BREAKING: Cox Assassin Gives Name at Court as "Death to Traitors, Freedom for Britain"

Thomas Mair at Westminster Magistrates Court

Yesterday, I tried to provide some context to the murder of British MP Jo Cox, arguing that it was almost certainly anti-Muslim in character.

A few hours ago it was reported that Ms. Cox uttered her last words to her Muslim aide, Fazila Aswat, as Ms. Aswat tried to comfort her.

Her father, Ghulam Maniyar, described the scene:

I'm not trying to be coy here. The point is that for anyone who wanted to act out his anti-Muslim views in a violent manner, Ms. Cox was an obvious target.

A few hours ago, the suspect, Thomas Mair, appeared in court. From the Daily Mail:
Unemployed gardener Thomas Mair (left), 52, of Birstall, has appeared at Westminster Magistrates' Court this morning after he was charged with the murder of Labour MP Jo Cox (inset). When asked for his name, the suspect (centre) accused of killing the mother of two replied 'death to traitors, freedom for Britain'. He has also been charged with grievous bodily harm, possession of a firearm with intent to commit an indictable offence and possession of an offensive weapon. Mrs Cox, 41, was killed on Thursday as she headed to a meeting with constituents in Birstall, near Leeds, West Yorkshire. In court, Deputy Chief Magistrate Emma Arbuthnot ordered that he be remanded in custody until his next appearance, at the Old Bailey on Monday. Ms Arbuthnot suggested that a psychiatric report should be prepared, saying: 'Bearing in mind the name he has just given, he ought to be seen by a psychiatrist.'


  1. We'll be seeing much more of this kind of thing. Our elites have deliberately made war on their own people, denying them their birthright, mocking their history, religion, and culture, and displacing them through the mass importation of barbarians. It's hardly surprising that a few on the fringes (of society or sanity) will choose to respond with violence.

    I'm not trying to be the (mythical) moderate Muslim here, deploring violence while at the same time excusing it. But diverse societies descend into war as sure as night follows day, unless you have the heavy hand of a Stalin or a Tito to keep a lid on things. And what happens when Tito dies?

    Likewise, we (lacking a Tito) are headed to war. Leftists are already beginning to make war on the wreckers hindering their coming utopia; which is to say, whites. Mahommedans are, per custom, making indiscriminate war on infidels. Other groups (blacks, latinos, Asians, gays) will join the fray as they see fit. And since our rulers will always find a way to blame us for the depredations of these groups, we should expect to see an increase in murderous responses from the unhinged among us.

    1. I completely agree. I'm surprised we haven't seen more of it. For every x number of Muslim terrorist attacks, we'll see one of these. And they'll feed on one another.

      The heavy-hand of a Tito wouldn't have prevented this, but it will embolden the heavy-hand of the status quo forces. The police are already visiting people for "anti-immigrant" Facebook posts. If this isn't an invitation for more of that, I don't know what is.

      And of course one has to be careful how one says these things. Explaining it doesn't justify it. But there will be those who do not understand that.

    2. Related.

      Your could say that liberalism is our Tito, though an amazingly incompetent one. Just as Tito and Stalin attempted to create a New Soviet Man by the ruthless suppression of ethnic and national sentiment, so too liberalism seeks to bury human particularities under a mountain of pornography and consumer goods.

      Of course, this assumes that liberals are sincere in their professed intention to bring about a multicultural rainbow world, but even this might be conceding too much. Tito had to die before Yugoslavia returned to its ancient mode of mutually hostile ethnicities, but the liberal experiment is fragmenting before our eyes. Which leads me to conclude that--apart from its legions of virtue-signalling useful idiots--liberal elites are just as comfortable with inter-group warfare as they would be with their multiethnic utopia: it poses no serious threat to their rule. Or so they reason, right up to the moment that the mob starts throwing nooses over lampposts.

      The only thing they seriously fear is the prospect of the Western peoples recovering their sense of themselves as cohesive societies with a distinct cultural and religious heritage. This is why Trump (Le Pen, Hofer, Golden Dawn, etc)--whatever their deficiencies from a Catholic standpoint--drive them mad with fear and rage.