Showing posts with label muhammad. Show all posts
Showing posts with label muhammad. Show all posts

Saturday, January 16, 2016

Pakistani Boy "Blasphemes" Muhammad by Mistake; Mortified, He Cuts Off Own Hand and Gives it to Imam; Parents, Neighbors and Villagers Celebrate

Modern civilization textbook 

This charming story was just reported by Agency France Press:
LAHORE (PAKISTAN) (AFP) -

A 15-year-old Pakistani boy cut off his own hand believing he had committed blasphemy, only to be celebrated by his parents and neighbours for the act, police told AFP Friday. 
Local police chief Nausher Ahmed described how an imam told a gathering at a village mosque that those who love the Prophet Mohammad always say their prayers, then asked who among the crowd had stopped praying. 
Mohammad Anwar, 15, raised his hand by mistake after apparently mishearing the question.

The crowd swiftly accused him of blasphemy so he went to his house and cut off the hand he had raised, put it on a plate, and presented it to the cleric, the police chief said. 
The incident took place at a village in Hujra Shah Muqeem district, some 125 kilometres (77 miles) south of Lahore, the capital of Punjab province, about four days ago, according to the policeman. 
Ahmed said that he has seen a video in which the boy is greeted by villagers in the street as his parents proclaim their pride. 
No complaint has been made, he said, so no police report has been filed and there will be no investigation.

Blasphemy is a hugely sensitive issue in Pakistan, an Islamic republic of some 200 million, where even unproven allegations frequently stir mob violence and lynchings. 
Critics including European governments say the country's blasphemy laws are often misused to settle personal scores.

Monday, January 4, 2016

Rare Film of G.K. Chesterton at Holy Cross College, Massachusetts: "I Can Only Say That I Am Not Much of a Crusader but at Least I'm not a Mohammedan"


Note the general laughter that follows the remark.

Now, if Chesterton had been alive today and said that sort of thing he could have had his publishing contract dropped and the rest of his lecture tour cancelled. He might have been banned from entering (or re-entering) the UK. Or, since the speech was uploaded to YouTube, it's possible he would have been charged with a hate crime violation.

Of course, even in 1931, Chesterton and his Catholic and Christian friends were somewhat out of step with the Zeitgeist. But the film shows just how far we have come. Chesterton was being made an honorary member of the Holy Cross Crusaders, after all. What would Bishop Barron think of that?

By the way, I too first thought he was holding a microphone. But in fact it's a walking stick, or rather, one of two walking sticks.

Enjoy!


Sunday, October 18, 2015

Mahound's Paradise is Now on Twitter!

Tweet me, Muhammad!

We resisted for months. But finally we succumbed. Mahound's Paradise is now on Twitter.

Muhammad's kisser will now appear on more devices than ever before.

Follow at your own risk.

Here was my first tweet and reply:

The above is a joke, of course. But there is a serious point.

Our freedoms are being rapidly taken from us. And freedom of speech is dying if not in some ways already dead. In a number of contexts, posting the kisser of that mass-murdering pedophile on Twitter can cost you your job. If it doesn't kill you first.

Let's fight that. 

The plan is to use Twitter in moderation. If our presence on Twitter makes it easier to follow the blog, or enhances your reading experience, great! if you don't give a damn and wouldn't sign up for Twitter if your life depended on it, God bless you.

In any case, cheers, and Je Suis Charlie, everyone!

Saturday, May 9, 2015

Muhammad: Destroy all Musical Instruments

"Sorry"
Yesterday I wrote about the Ayatollah Khomeini's negative views about fun, joy and humor.

It's tempting to dismiss this sort of thing as a manifestation of modern-day Islamic "extremism". After all, weren't Muslims in the "golden-age" of Islam trilling flutes and strumming harps, composing love-poetry and eating sherbet, while Europeans were scrambling around in the mud bashing each other with crude clubs?

We'll discuss the Islamic view of music and musical instruments shortly, but first let's backtrack for a moment and ask: How do we know what Islam itself allows or prohibits?

Well, as all faithful Muslims would agree, first you look at the Koran to see what Allah, or through him Muhammad, commanded or said. Then you look at the Hadith--accounts of what Muhammad said or did. That's pretty much it. As far as I can tell, there's no Natural Law tradition in Islam. In other words, the commands or prohibitions don't obviously have to make sense. If God said it or Muhammad said it or did it, that's good enough.

So, with reference to Muhammad. If he treated captives in a certain way--executing some, sparing others, selling still others into slavery, etc.--then your job is to figure out the pattern and imitate it. If he had this to say about how to treat political enemies, then that's how you treat them. If he liked cats, then cats are good. If he made love in this position but not that one, then guess what? If he smoked cigarettes in a cigarette holder, then you...

Okay, sorry, that was Ayn Rand, but the point stands.

Now, the question arises as to what to do if it appears that Muhammad said or did two contradictory things. If both are verified and accepted as true, then the latter one rules. Muhammad changed his mind, or circumstances changed or whatever, and you go with the last and basically ignore the first. The first one is abrogated.

And by the way, the changing one's mind thing applies to Allah himself in the Koran. Indeed, there are so many seeming instances of this that to the skeptic it gets a bit comical. Sure enough, the Koran has more than a few things to say about the phenomenon:
If We abrogate a verse or cause it to be forgotten, We will replace it by a better one or one similar (2:106). 
God abrogates and confirms what He pleases. His is the Decree Eternal (13:39). 
If We pleased We could take away that which We have revealed to you (17:86). 
When We change one verse for another (God knows best what He reveals), they say: "You are an impostor" (16:101).
You got that one right, Skippy.

It is this that lies at the heart of the issue of those "peaceful" versus "warlike" parts of the Koran. The peaceful ones are all chronologically earlier. Muhammad began by attempting to spread Islam in a non-coercive manner. When that didn't work, he took up the sword. It worked better. And that's where things stood when he died, and where they have stood ever since. The sword rules.

Now in the Hadith--the gathered sayings and deeds of Muhammed--there is sometimes a bit more controversy about which sayings are "verified". There are tens of thousands of the things and multiple compilers. I think it's fair to say that there's a great deal of agreement on much of the important stuff with some arguments around the edges.

So what did Muhammad have to say about musical instruments?

Bukhari, perhaps the most accepted and respected of the Hadith compilers has the Prophet saying:
From among my followers there will be some people who will consider illegal sexual intercourse, the wearing of silk, the drinking of alcoholic drinks, and the use of musical instruments as lawful. And (from them), there will be some who will stay near the side of a mountain, and in the evening their shepherd will come to them with their sheep and ask them for something, but they will say to him, "Return to us tomorrow." Allah will destroy them during the night and will let the mountain fall on them, and Allah will transform the rest of them into monkeys and pigs and they will remain so till the Day of Resurrection (7:494).
Another compiler, Qudsi, relates:
The Prophet said that Allah commanded him to destroy all the musical instruments, idols, crosses and all the trappings of ignorance. Allah said that if a man took even a mouthful of wine, He would make him drink the same quantity of pus of the wounds of the people in Hell (19:5).
By the way, the pus thing is not unique. The Koran is filled with similar grotesque imagery.

It should be said that the Koran and Hadith are somewhat mixed when it comes to singing. On the weight of the overall evidence some have said that all singing is condemned, though this is hard to square with the preferred quasi-musical chanting of the Koran. The majority view, perhaps, is that while some singing is permitted, especially if for a religious or other serious motivation, in general, singing is frivolous and potentially dangerous.

It could lead to musical instruments.

In fairness, many Islamic scholars have interpreted the musical-instrument "prohibition" in a milder manner similar to the way singing is regarded. Some instruments in some contexts might be allowable as long as their purpose is not for frivolous enjoyment or entertainment. The scholar I just linked to even goes so far as to say that "the use of the drums are unequivocally permissible for festivals and weddings and joyous times." Take that, Ayatollah Sourpuss.

So, do people in Islamic countries use musical instruments? Even for entertainment? Do they do it even (close your eyes and cover your ears) just for fun?

Of course. Whatever the ruling ideology or government says, when it comes to fun, people are always trying. Perhaps it's evolutionary. Or if you prefer, God (the real God) has built the thirst for joy into our very spirit.

But when, say, ISIS in some new outrage, melts all the brass instruments of the Mosul Symphony Orchestra into war materiel, or bans whistling or cuts off the hands of twenty marimba players or whatever, and you hear or read people scolding, as you just know they will, that's not authentic Islam! Actually...

It is.

Don't blame me, man.

It all goes back to Muhammad.

Tuesday, May 5, 2015

Pigs Can Fly! Sort Of


What would Muhammad say?

From The Telegraph:
Pigs can fly: Chinese May Day celebration criticised for pushing pigs off bridge 
A city in central China has been criticised for hosting a tourist attraction which saw pigs being pushed off a bridge into a lake 
By Harriet Alexander 6:35PM BST 04 May 2015 
A tourism official in central China came up with a novel way of entertaining visitors to Shiyan Lake, by creating a show featuring "flying" pigs. 
The animals were herded onto a bridge above the lake in Changsha. Identified by red numbers painted on their sides, the pigs were then driven off the bridge by a man holding a stick, and splashed into the water below. 
In photos published on the Facebook page of Chinese state broadcaster CCTV, groups of tourists stood on the side, taking photos of the spectacle. 
The controversial event was defended by Shi Huang, who organised it. 
"The piglets are carefully trained to perform this special stunt and they get well rewarded with food," he said, according to Mail Online. "And once they get over their nerves they clearly enjoyed it. "Anybody who says it is cruel is clearly not well informed that pigs like water." 
But tourism officials reportedly received complaints. 
Lok Chiang, writing online, said: "This was clearly animal abuse. It may well be the case that pigs like water, but not jumping into it from the top of a huge platform. 
"That just isn't natural for any pig, there is no way you can claim they enjoy it." 
And comments beneath the CCTV pictures were generally critical of the event. 
"That's disgusting," said Geraldine Walker. 
Eva Cohen described the event as "nauseating". 
And Giselle Kuchirka wrote: "What is so entertaining about forcing scared animals into doing things they wouldn't normally do?"
Oh, come on. The piglets are carefully trained to perform this special stunt and they get well rewarded with food.

Sunday, May 3, 2015

The People's Choice Winner of the Muhammad Art Exhibit and Cartoon Contest


This cartoon by Bosch Fawstin was the "People's Choice" winner, chosen in the run-up to the pro-free-speech Muhammad Art Exhibit and Cartoon Contest this weekend in Garland, Texas.

The overall winner was announced this afternoon and will be featured on this blog as soon as possible.

Earlier this evening two gunmen moved against the gathering and were shot to death by police. A security officer was injured, though not seriously.

There are unconfirmed reports that ISIS has taken responsibility for the attack.

As participants were being herded into lockdown by police, someone unfurled an American flag. People sang God Bless America and prayed for the fallen officer.