Thursday, July 28, 2016

BORING: If We're Going to Get an Evita, Can't We At Least Have an Interesting One? (FULL VIDEO)

Hillary Clinton's speech was boring and predictable.

Donald Trump's speech (as long as it was) was quirky, interesting and original.

Does that mean Clinton is bad and Trump is good?


Does that mean Trump will be a better president than Clinton?


But whatever else it is, it's the Frumpster vs. the Trumpster.

Obviously, I have my preferences, but that's not the point.

Demographics and policies will determine 90% of this election.

The question is, will the final 10% be swung by standard political slogans or spunky in-your-face claims and quips.

I have no idea.

Trump is currently beating Clinton in the polls.

On the other hand (and probably more importantly) Clinton is beating Trump 2:1 in the prediction markets.

On the other hand, Nate Silver is betting 57.5% for Trump.

What do you think?


  1. I think it depends on if we have another Jihad attack on American soil right before the election.

  2. Half of democrats who voted Bernie Sanders in primaries, will vote for Green Party, or Republicans, or not vote at all; Donald J. Trump is gaining followers who prefer nationalism vs globalist openess of Hillary Clinton. The world trend is not pro-globalism, but pro-nationalism, so I think Donald Trump will win landslide. I have a bias for Mr. Trump.